gary miller budget workbook kingdom focused finances

I examine the empirical validity of five competing models of government growth for the fifty U.S. The superior performance of the statist perspective is due to its applicability across outcomes and subsamples.ĭespite the explosive increase in the research program on government growth in recent years, little work has been done on government growth disaggregated to the subnational level. The findings suggest that the different perspectives are limited in applicability to specific outcomes or samples, or both. Although the results yield some support for all three perspectives, the statist perspective is especially well supported. In the analysis, the sample is split into industrialized and nonindustrialized states, in accordance with recent cross-national research on social policy and social spending.

These outcomes represent different dimensions of social policy and are used to appraise three theoretical approaches: economic, democratic politics, and statist explanations. It analyzes six outcomes: state emergency-relief expenditures and federal emergency-relief expenditures from 1933 to 1935 the timing of passage of unemployment-compensation legislation the timing of passage of old-age pension legislation and the contents of old-age pension and unemployment-compensation legislation.

This paper reports the results of a cross-sectional analysis of emergency relief, unemployment insurance, and old-age pensions in the 48 American states.

Lewis Committee Member: John Clayton Thomas Committee Member: Juan Rogers Committee Member: Katherine Willoughby The influence of the advisory board and of the institute director¡¯s public service experience on the individual institute¡¯s expenditure level is significantly diminished by the frequent use of omnibus appropriations bills. The effects of the director¡¯s public service experience and the advisory boards have more budgetary impact in the general science-focused institutes than in their disease-focused counterparts. Drawing on theories of motivations of public officials and of political clout of agency heads and considering empirical studies of the effect of omnibus legislation, this study reveals the following: 1) directors with more public service experience are more successful in securing a higher budget for their institutes 2) while the directors are found to be driven by public service motivation, when it comes to expenditure allocation between two different mechanisms, they behave in a self-interested manner, representing the interests of the institutional sectors where they have developed close relationships 3) with ever-increasing budgets between 19, the institute directors have chosen to seek higher budgets rather than merely avoid the risk of budget cuts 4) although the advisory boards are purportedly used to seek private input for the priority setting, they tend to increase intramural more than external research project grant expenditures 5) the practice of omnibus appropriations bills significantly benefits the institutes under the NIH such that with omnibus legislation the institutes¡¯ total expenditures have more than doubled controlling the other factors and 6) there are significant differences in the effects of the director¡¯s public experience and the number of advisory boards and their membership both (i) between disease-focused institutes and nondisease institutes and (ii) with and without omnibus legislation. The NIH uses two major expenditure mechanisms with very different beneficiary groups: the principal investigator-initiated Research Project Grants and Intramural Research. This study examines 1) whether the different expenditure mechanisms used by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) invite different sources of influences on the budget process and thus on the expenditure outcomes and 2) whether the frequent use of omnibus appropriations bills since 1996 has changed budget levels of the institutes under the NIH.

Gary miller budget workbook kingdom focused finances